linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7 v1]powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on protection key violation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <622d7abf-3d99-8897-5afb-ef8c4f950fc0@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:50:13 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dave.hansen@...el.com, paulus@...ba.org,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7 v1]powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on protection key
 violation.

On 06/06/2017 06:35 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> The value of the AMR register at the time of the exception
> is made available in gp_regs[PT_AMR] of the siginfo.

But its already available there in uctxt->uc_mcontext.regs->amr
while inside the signal delivery context in the user space. The
pt_regs already got updated with new AMR register. Then why we
need gp_regs to also contain AMR as well ?