linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7 v1]powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on protection key violation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1497609181.2897.100.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 20:33:01 +1000
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dave.hansen@...el.com, paulus@...ba.org,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7 v1]powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on protection
 key violation.

On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 14:50 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 06:35 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> > The value of the AMR register at the time of the exception
> > is made available in gp_regs[PT_AMR] of the siginfo.
> 
> But its already available there in uctxt->uc_mcontext.regs->amr
> while inside the signal delivery context in the user space. The
> pt_regs already got updated with new AMR register. Then why we
> need gp_regs to also contain AMR as well ?

Also changing gp_regs layout/size is a major ABI issue...

Ben.