[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2264017.eLNdPIXHd9@diego>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:35:12 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Frank Wang <frank.wang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
charles.chen@...k-chips.com, kevan.lan@...k-chips.com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com, david.wu@...k-chips.com,
shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, wmc@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: rockchip: add efuse device node for rk3228
Am Freitag, 16. Juni 2017, 17:24:23 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 2017/6/15 23:10, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2017, 15:23:16 CEST schrieb Frank Wang:
> >> From: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>
> >>
> >> Add a efuse node in the device tree for the rk3228 SoC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> index c2a78f4..dad195e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> >> @@ -314,6 +314,23 @@
> >>
> >> status = "disabled";
> >>
> >> };
> >>
> >> + efuse: efuse@...40000 {
> >> + compatible = "rockchip,rk322x-efuse";
> >
> > was this binding included already? Simply because compatibles should
> > not contain placeholders, so rockchip,rk3228-efuse please - same for
> > the driver side.
>
> Actually, I always remember it should be without placeholders from the
> first time you commented :-)
> but I saw that the binding and driver (rockchip,rk322x-efuse) have
> already been applied, so I send this one keep the same with driver side.
> Shall I resend a new patch to correct both of them to
> 'rockchip,rk3228-efuse' ?
Yes please :-) .
As it was probably applied for 4.13, changing the compatible shouldn't be
a problem.
Thanks
Heiko
>
>
> BR.
> Frank
>
> > Heiko
> >
> >> + reg = <0x11040000 0x20>;
> >> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >> + #size-cells = <1>;
> >> + clocks = <&cru PCLK_EFUSE_256>;
> >> + clock-names = "pclk_efuse";
> >> +
> >> + /* Data cells */
> >> + efuse_id: id@7 {
> >> + reg = <0x7 0x10>;
> >> + };
> >> + cpu_leakage: cpu_leakage@17 {
> >> + reg = <0x17 0x1>;
> >> + };
> >> + };
> >> +
> >>
> >> i2c0: i2c@...50000 {
> >>
> >> compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-i2c";
> >> reg = <0x11050000 0x1000>;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists