[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497711392.4684.11.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:56:32 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>, mszeredi@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/27] VFS: Introduce the structs and doc for a
filesystem context [ver #5]
On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 15:18 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> > I don't know that this is a hard and fast rule. Struct bio uses a
> > "bi_" prefix (e.g., bi_error, bi_opf, bi_iter, etc.).
>
> Linus told me to stop doing it.
>
> David
That's a pity... I tend to like little prefixes on fields too. Trying to
find all occurrences of a symbol called "flags" in cscope is a losing
exercise.
Do you have a reference to the discussion so I can understand the
rationale there?
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists