[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170619161323.pjdrh6l33pqix32x@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:13:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Xue, Ken" <Ken.Xue@....com>,
"S-k, Shyam-sundar" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:33:10AM +0000, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply. Agree on points.
>
> we will validate at our end and shall provide the update.
Any news on the issue? Resolution?
I still have a user reporting "irq 7: nobody cared (try booting with the
"irqpoll" option)" pointing to amd_gpio_irq_handler(), even with Thomas'
patch.
See https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034261
So something's still not completely fine yet.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists