lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:13:23 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: "Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "Xue, Ken" <Ken.Xue@....com>, "S-k, Shyam-sundar" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Use regular interrupt instead of chained On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 09:33:10AM +0000, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thanks for the prompt reply. Agree on points. > > we will validate at our end and shall provide the update. Any news on the issue? Resolution? I still have a user reporting "irq 7: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)" pointing to amd_gpio_irq_handler(), even with Thomas' patch. See https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034261 So something's still not completely fine yet. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists