[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706210001280.2157@nanos>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:04:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL V11] irq: next irq tracking
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The first patch adds the IRQF_TIMER flag to the timers which are percpu in
> order to discard any timing measurement when the interrupt is coming from a
> timer. All the timers changes have been discarded from V10.
I merily asked for splitting them out into a separate patch, but I'm fine
with dropping them completely. But with them dropped, there is no point to
actually change the interface right now. Then 1/3 can be dropped as well
and we do a scripted interface change right before 4.13-rc1 and queue the
timer driver changes for 4.14
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists