lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706210001280.2157@nanos>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:04:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL V11] irq: next irq tracking

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The first patch adds the IRQF_TIMER flag to the timers which are percpu in
> order to discard any timing measurement when the interrupt is coming from a
> timer. All the timers changes have been discarded from V10.

I merily asked for splitting them out into a separate patch, but I'm fine
with dropping them completely. But with them dropped, there is no point to
actually change the interface right now. Then 1/3 can be dropped as well
and we do a scripted interface change right before 4.13-rc1 and queue the
timer driver changes for 4.14

Thanks,

	tglx


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ