[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621105718.GA2479@mai>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:57:18 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL V11] irq: next irq tracking
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:04:54AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > The first patch adds the IRQF_TIMER flag to the timers which are percpu in
> > order to discard any timing measurement when the interrupt is coming from a
> > timer. All the timers changes have been discarded from V10.
>
> I merily asked for splitting them out into a separate patch, but I'm fine
> with dropping them completely. But with them dropped, there is no point to
> actually change the interface right now. Then 1/3 can be dropped as well
> and we do a scripted interface change right before 4.13-rc1 and queue the
> timer driver changes for 4.14
Ok, I updated the irq timings branch without the 1/3.
http://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git next-irq/4.13-v11.1
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists