[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568198ed-78e4-bd9d-3dad-0a8954bb97d1@kaod.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:55:58 +0200
From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
To: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux@...ck-us.net, stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: jdelvare@...e.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
mpe@...erman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] hwmon: (ibmpowernv) introduce a legacy_compatibles
array
On 06/20/2017 09:15 AM, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
>
>
> On 06/20/2017 11:36 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 06/20/2017 07:08 AM, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
>>> From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
>>>
>>> Today, the type of a PowerNV sensor system is determined with the
>>> "compatible" property for legacy Firmwares and with the "sensor-type"
>>> for newer ones. The same array of strings is used for both to do the
>>> matching and this raises some issue to introduce new sensor types.
>>>
>>> Let's introduce two different arrays (legacy and current) to make
>>> things easier for new sensor types.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>
>>> Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Did you test on a Tuleta (IBM Power) system ?
>
> I have tested this patch on P9 FSP and Firestone.
OK. I just gave it a try on a Tuleta, P8 FSP, IBM Power system
Looks good.
Thanks,
C.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> C.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c
>>> index 862b832..6d8909c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c
>>> @@ -55,17 +55,27 @@ enum sensors {
>>>
>>> #define INVALID_INDEX (-1U)
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * 'compatible' string properties for sensor types as defined in old
>>> + * PowerNV firmware (skiboot). These are ordered as 'enum sensors'.
>>> + */
>>> +static const char * const legacy_compatibles[] = {
>>> + "ibm,opal-sensor-cooling-fan",
>>> + "ibm,opal-sensor-amb-temp",
>>> + "ibm,opal-sensor-power-supply",
>>> + "ibm,opal-sensor-power"
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> static struct sensor_group {
>>> - const char *name;
>>> - const char *compatible;
>>> + const char *name; /* matches property 'sensor-type' */
>>> struct attribute_group group;
>>> u32 attr_count;
>>> u32 hwmon_index;
>>> } sensor_groups[] = {
>>> - {"fan", "ibm,opal-sensor-cooling-fan"},
>>> - {"temp", "ibm,opal-sensor-amb-temp"},
>>> - {"in", "ibm,opal-sensor-power-supply"},
>>> - {"power", "ibm,opal-sensor-power"}
>>> + { "fan" },
>>> + { "temp" },
>>> + { "in" },
>>> + { "power" }
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct sensor_data {
>>> @@ -239,8 +249,8 @@ static int get_sensor_type(struct device_node *np)
>>> enum sensors type;
>>> const char *str;
>>>
>>> - for (type = 0; type < MAX_SENSOR_TYPE; type++) {
>>> - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, sensor_groups[type].compatible))
>>> + for (type = 0; type < ARRAY_SIZE(legacy_compatibles); type++) {
>>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, legacy_compatibles[type]))
>>> return type;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists