linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acer-wmi: Using zero as the first WMI instance number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd1ZRpZc3P5qnsiWTiURCUSOjsRfPKgShe3seJmsh1GRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:22:46 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     "Lee, Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@...il.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acer-wmi: Using zero as the first WMI instance number

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 June 2017 17:06:23 Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
>> Pali Rohár found that there have some wmi query/evaluation
>> code that they used 'one' as the first WMI instance number.
>> But the number is indexed from zero that it's must less than
>> the instance_count in _WDG.
>>
>> This patch changes those instance number from one to zero.
>>
>> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@...e.com>
>
> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>

Unfortunately patchwork ignores this tag.
So, in the future please:
- put a tag on a separate line
- do _not_ prepend it by any characters including white spaces (except
new line :-) )

No need to resend this one.

Pushed to testing, thanks!

>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
>> index 79fa5ab..ef420b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c
>> @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *result)
>>       input.length = sizeof(struct wmab_args);
>>       input.pointer = (u8 *)regbuf;
>>
>> -     status = wmi_evaluate_method(AMW0_GUID1, 1, 1, &input, result);
>> +     status = wmi_evaluate_method(AMW0_GUID1, 0, 1, &input, result);
>>
>>       return status;
>>  }
>> @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ WMI_execute_u32(u32 method_id, u32 in, u32 *out)
>>       u32 tmp = 0;
>>       acpi_status status;
>>
>> -     status = wmi_evaluate_method(WMID_GUID1, 1, method_id, &input, &result);
>> +     status = wmi_evaluate_method(WMID_GUID1, 0, method_id, &input, &result);
>>
>>       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>>               return status;
>> @@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ static acpi_status __init WMID_set_capabilities(void)
>>       acpi_status status;
>>       u32 devices;
>>
>> -     status = wmi_query_block(WMID_GUID2, 1, &out);
>> +     status = wmi_query_block(WMID_GUID2, 0, &out);
>>       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>>               return status;
>>
>> @@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ static u32 get_wmid_devices(void)
>>       acpi_status status;
>>       u32 devices = 0;
>>
>> -     status = wmi_query_block(WMID_GUID2, 1, &out);
>> +     status = wmi_query_block(WMID_GUID2, 0, &out);
>>       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>>               return 0;
>>
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar@...il.com



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko