[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621145208.Horde.eM1O3f5tAb_tIuGcYvFpDJZ@gator4166.hostgator.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:52:08 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
To: Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: add check on e1e_wphy() return
value
Hi Ethan,
Quoting Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>:
> Gustavo,
>
> The return value of ret_val seems used to check if the access to PHY/NVM
> got its semaphore, generally speaking, it is needed for every PHY
> access of this driver.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.zhao@...cle.com>
>
Thank you very much for the clarification.
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <garsilva@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>> Check return value from call to e1e_wphy(). This value is being
>> checked during previous calls to function e1e_wphy() and it seems
>> a check was missing here.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1226905
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
>> index 68ea8b4..d6d4ed7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
>> @@ -2437,6 +2437,8 @@ static s32
>> e1000_hv_phy_workarounds_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
>> if (hw->phy.revision < 2) {
>> e1000e_phy_sw_reset(hw);
>> ret_val = e1e_wphy(hw, MII_BMCR, 0x3140);
>> + if (ret_val)
>> + return ret_val;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Powered by blists - more mailing lists