[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621201727.GC25900@fury>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:17:27 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not update ACPI
device power status
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 06:40:56AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote:
> Calling acpi_bus_update_power() for ACPI devices FUJ02B1 and FUJ02E3 is
> pointless as they are not power manageable (neither _PS0 nor _PR0 is
> defined for any of them), which causes their power state to be inherited
> from their parent devices. Given the ACPI paths of these two devices
> (\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.FJEX, \_SB.FEXT), their parent devices are also not
> power manageable. These parent devices will thus have their power state
> initialized to ACPI_STATE_D0, which in turn causes the power state for
> both FUJ02B1 and FUJ02E3 to always be ACPI_STATE_D0 ("on").
>
How confident are we that all implementations of these two ACPI devices lack
_PS0 and _PR0 ?
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists