[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce253162-3a0d-863c-17a9-e6f5511ee91e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:02:30 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luis Claudio R . Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/debug: Inform the number of rt/dl task that can
migrate
On 06/22/2017 11:29 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Note that this patch breaks in various cross-builds - here's the Alpha defconfig
> build:
>
> /home/mingo/tip/kernel/sched/debug.c: In function 'print_rt_rq':
> /home/mingo/tip/kernel/sched/debug.c:556:60: error: 'struct rt_rq' has no member
> named 'rt_nr_migratory'
> SEQ_printf(m, " .%-30s: %lu\n", #x, (unsigned long)(rt_rq->x))
> ^
> /home/mingo/tip/kernel/sched/debug.c:33:17: note: in definition of macro
> 'SEQ_printf'
> seq_printf(m, x); \
> ...
Oops...
The rt_nr_migratory is conditioned to:
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
Sorry for the miss attention, I will fix this.
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists