[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170622194747.syydubjhgus2lmn3@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:47:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
riel@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on
nohz_full CPUs
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 04:11:53AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Commit-ID: 387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/387bc8b5536eeb0a92f4b4ab553539eaea2ac0ba
> > Author: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > AuthorDate: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:12:02 +0200
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:30:02 +0200
> >
> > sched/fair: Spare idle load balancing on nohz_full CPUs
>
> Thanks for applying the series! The two other patches are indeed good but
> Rik and Mike have mitigated feelings about this very patch. I think we need to decouple
> housekeeping from nohz_full before applying it. Is it possible to set it aside
> for now?
Well, if patches are forthcoming and the commit isn't buggy per se, we could have
it with the note of it being improved further.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists