[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170623211603.GD28216@thor.bakeyournoodle.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 07:16:03 +1000
From: Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, info@...nelci.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: enabling COMPILE_TEST support for GCC plugins in v4.11
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:43:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> [Old thread just popped up in my inbox]
>
> Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> > <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to get the GCC plugins building under
> >>> allyesconfig/allmodconfig for -next soon (with the intention of
> >>> landing the change in v4.11). Specifically, I intend to revert
> >>> a519167e753e ("gcc-plugins: disable under COMPILE_TEST").
> >>
> >> If I recall correctly, I noted that the plugins broke the kernel.org
> >> cross compiler toolchains which led to the above disable.
> >
> > Do you mean these?
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
>
> I think those are the ones Paul is talking about.
>
> Those were mostly built by Tony, who is know, sadly, an Openstack
> developer and for some reason doesn't seem to have time to build
> toolchains for kernel hackers :P
Yeah sad but true. Building a full suit took a couple of days and I'm
just not going to find that anytime soon.
I don't really want to build them one at a time but I could I suppose,
I'd play favotites x64_86, ppc64le and then the others if and when time
becomes an option. My problem with that is it kinda defeats the aim on
why I put th etoolchains up there. to enable testing accross the range
of architectures in a consistent way.
Another option would clearly be to find someone that is closer to the
kernel to do this thing.
Ho hum thoughts?
> As folks may have seen on LWN, there are now pre-built toolchains for
> many architectures available from the Free Electrons guys, so that may
> help to unblock this situation somewhat:
>
> http://toolchains.free-electrons.com/
So ubuntu and Fedora each have cross toolschains in the distro and we
that those ^^. Perhaps this no longer needs to be provided by the
kernel community?
Yours Tony.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists