linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/module.c: Invert add_usage_link and del_usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:37:12 +0200
From:   Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc:     rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/module.c: Invert add_usage_link and
 del_usage_link functions

+++ Corentin Labbe [20/06/17 08:45 +0200]:
>On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:26:23PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> +++ Corentin Labbe [06/06/17 14:17 +0200]:
>> >This patch just swap del_usage_link() before add_usage_link().
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
>>
>> Could you combine this with the 2nd patch? By itself this patch
>> doesn't tell us much. Additionally, could you explain in the changelog
>> (of the 2nd patch) why they needed to be swapped (i.e., so
>> del_usage_links() can be called from add_usage_links()).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Jessica
>>
>
>I think that its against the rule of atomic/simple patch.
>Perhaps, the first patch miss some "why I do it"
>
>Anyway I will send a new version as you requested

Hi Corentin,

I've folded the first patch with the second and applied them to
modules-next, no need to resend the patchset :)

Thanks!

Jessica