[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1537403.PHBCuCX8Fr@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 02:15:12 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: dt: Set default policy->transition_delay_ns
On Monday, May 22, 2017 04:57:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22-05-17, 19:17, Leo Yan wrote:
> > This afternoon Amit pointed me for this patch, should fix as below?
> > Otherwise it seems directly assign the same value from unit 'ns' to
> > 'us' but without any value conversion.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > index 76877a6..dcc90fc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > unsigned int lat;
> >
> > tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
> > - lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
> > + lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > if (lat)
> > tunables->rate_limit_us *= lat;
> > }
>
> I will let Rafael comment in as well. NSEC_PER_USEC is used in the
> earlier governors as well (ondemand/conservative) in exactly the same
> way as schedutil is using.
The reason why it is used by schedutil is because the other governors used it
that way. IOW, doesn't matter. :-)
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists