[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170627001727.GB5846@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:17:27 -0700
From: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
hbabu@...ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 02/23] powerpc: introduce set_hidx_slot helper
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:02:58PM -0500, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 09:03 +1000, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 18:39 -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
> > > Introduce set_hidx_slot() which sets the (H_PAGE_F_SECOND|H_PAGE_F_GIX)
> > > bits at the appropriate location in the PTE of 4K PTE. In the
> > > case of 64K PTE, it sets the bits in the second part of the PTE. Though
> > > the implementation for the former just needs the slot parameter, it does
> > > take some additional parameters to keep the prototype consistent.
> > >
> > > This function will come in handy as we work towards re-arranging the
> > > bits in the later patches.
>
> The name somewhat sucks. Something like pte_set_hash_slot() or
> something like that would be much more meaningful.
ok. pte_set_hash_slot() sounds good.
RP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists