[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170627134033.d6df2435117d52721d37a748@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:40:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, mhocko@...e.cz,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2017-06-23-15-03 uploaded
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:38:09 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> However, the patch in mmotm seems to be missing this crucial hunk that
> >> Rasmus had in the patch he sent [1]:
> >>
> >> -__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int
> >> start_migratetype)
> >> +__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype)
> >>
> >> which makes this a signed vs signed comparison.
> >>
> >> What happened to it? Andrew?
>
> This is really odd. Checking, I see that it was also absent from the
> 'this patch has been added to -mm' mail, but I admit I don't proofread
> those to see they match what I sent. Oh well. Let me know if I need to
> do anything.
>
oops, that was me manually fixing rejects - I missed a bit.
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_allocc-eliminate-unsigned-confusion-in-__rmqueue_fallback-fix
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ static bool unreserve_highatomic_pageblo
* condition simpler.
*/
static inline bool
-__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int start_migratetype)
+__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype)
{
struct free_area *area;
int current_order;
_
Powered by blists - more mailing lists