[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwiHFjfrWqa+0NhL1EHKJwmghrL52Xzn-tYJsOi1B41shCsTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:38:09 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, mhocko@...e.cz,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2017-06-23-15-03 uploaded
>>
>> However, the patch in mmotm seems to be missing this crucial hunk that
>> Rasmus had in the patch he sent [1]:
>>
>> -__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, int
>> start_migratetype)
>> +__rmqueue_fallback(struct zone *zone, int order, int start_migratetype)
>>
>> which makes this a signed vs signed comparison.
>>
>> What happened to it? Andrew?
This is really odd. Checking, I see that it was also absent from the
'this patch has been added to -mm' mail, but I admit I don't proofread
those to see they match what I sent. Oh well. Let me know if I need to
do anything.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists