[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61bbcc19-a818-6934-75e9-8aed28523aa0@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:40:24 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the
injected #PF is async_pf
On 22/06/2017 04:06, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>
> Add an async_page_fault field to vcpu->arch.exception to identify an async
> page fault, and constructs the expected vm-exit information fields. Force
> a nested VM exit from nested_vmx_check_exception() if the injected #PF
> is async page fault. Extending the userspace interface KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS
> and KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS for live migration.
I am not sure what would happen if new kernel (that can produce
async_page_fault=1) runs on top of old userspace (that can consume it).
I think it would be safer to make the new field "nested_apf", and only
set it if in guest_mode, like
vcpu->arch.exception.nested_apf =
is_guest_mode(vcpu) && fault->async_page_fault;
if (vcpu->arch.exception.nested_apf)
vcpu->arch.apf.nested_apf_token = fault->address;
else
vcpu->arch.cr2 = fault->address;
What do you think?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists