[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18eb67d5-d426-e69d-49d5-d8c434f40da7@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:40:41 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the
injected #PF is async_pf
On 27/06/2017 03:47, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> -static int nested_vmx_check_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr)
> +static int nested_vmx_check_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
> + unsigned int nr = vcpu->arch.exception.nr;
>
> - if (!(vmcs12->exception_bitmap & (1u << nr)))
> + if (!((vmcs12->exception_bitmap & (1u << nr)) ||
> + (nr == PF_VECTOR && vcpu->arch.exception.async_page_fault)))
> return 0;
>
> + if (vcpu->arch.exception.async_page_fault) {
> + vmcs_write32(VM_EXIT_INTR_ERROR_CODE, vcpu->arch.exception.error_code);
> + nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI,
> + PF_VECTOR | INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION |
> + INTR_INFO_DELIVER_CODE_MASK | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK,
> + vcpu->arch.apf.nested_apf_token);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI,
> vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_INTR_INFO),
> vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION));
> @@ -2442,7 +2453,7 @@ static void vmx_queue_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> u32 intr_info = nr | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK;
>
> if (!reinject && is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> - nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, nr))
> + nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu))
> return;
>
> if (has_error_code) {
The corresponding change for svm.c should be:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 6e3095d1bad4..b92f56b98844 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -2391,15 +2391,19 @@ static int nested_svm_check_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned nr,
if (!is_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu))
return 0;
+ vmexit = nested_svm_intercept(svm);
+ if (vmexit != NESTED_EXIT_DONE)
+ return 0;
+
svm->vmcb->control.exit_code = SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + nr;
svm->vmcb->control.exit_code_hi = 0;
svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = error_code;
- svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr2;
-
- vmexit = nested_svm_intercept(svm);
- if (vmexit == NESTED_EXIT_DONE)
- svm->nested.exit_required = true;
+ if (svm->vcpu.arch.exception.nested_apf)
+ svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = svm->vcpu.arch.apf.nested_apf_token;
+ else
+ svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = svm->vcpu.arch.cr2;
+ svm->nested.exit_required = true;
return vmexit;
}
@@ -2592,7 +2596,7 @@ static int nested_svm_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
vmexit = NESTED_EXIT_DONE;
/* async page fault always cause vmexit */
else if ((exit_code == SVM_EXIT_EXCP_BASE + PF_VECTOR) &&
- svm->apf_reason != 0)
+ svm->vcpu.arch.exception.nested_apf)
vmexit = NESTED_EXIT_DONE;
break;
}
(where I'm already using the "nested_apf" name I proposed in the other email.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists