linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: caam: cleanup CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1mXeH+qdW=MFKO7i4oXw3yfLj-QU=09Y=MvD5y-T4zmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:20:51 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Dan Douglass <dan.douglass@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: caam: cleanup CONFIG_64BIT ifdefs when
 using io{read|write}64

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> wrote:
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> -#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h>

Here you include the hi-lo variant unconditionally.

> -#else /* CONFIG_64BIT */
> -static inline void wr_reg64(void __iomem *reg, u64 data)
> -{
> -#ifndef CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_FSL_CAAM_IMX
> -       if (caam_little_end) {
> -               wr_reg32((u32 __iomem *)(reg) + 1, data >> 32);
> -               wr_reg32((u32 __iomem *)(reg), data);
> -       } else
>  #endif
> -       {
> -               wr_reg32((u32 __iomem *)(reg), data >> 32);
> -               wr_reg32((u32 __iomem *)(reg) + 1, data);
> -       }
> +               iowrite64be(data, reg);
>  }

However, the #else path here uses lo-hi instead. I guess we have
to decide how to define iowrite64be_lo_hi() first: it could
either byteswap the 64-bit value first, then write the two halves,
or it could write the two halves, doing a 32-bit byte swap on
each.

       Arnd