[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e32bd057-2069-63c9-b75d-3a97a736d898@deltatee.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:02:57 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be] macros
On 28/06/17 04:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is wrong since ioread* is not the same read* on x86 and other
> architectures that have native PCI PIO accessors, or that require
> additional barriers for those.
>
> You have to copy hi_lo_readq() here, and call ioread32 twice instead
> of calling readl() twice. Same for iowrite64.
>
>> +#ifndef ioread64be
>> +#define ioread64be(p) be64_to_cpu(ioread64(p))
>> +#endif
>
> This has another problem: ioread64() is defined to access little-endian
> registers, just like readq(). This means that instead of be64_to_cpu()
> you need swab64() and always perform the byte swap, otherwise this
> would be broken on big-endian architectures.
Ah, ok, understood. I'll see if I can fix both these issues.
Thanks,
Logan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists