[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E582614F-2B53-44BF-8E2E-000E27D510AB@cavium.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 01:44:31 +0000
From: "Madhani, Himanshu" <Himanshu.Madhani@...ium.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
CC: Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...ium.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qla2xxx: Protect access to qpair members with
qpair->qp_lock
Hi Martin,
On 6/27/17, 6:32 PM, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
> In qla2xx_start_scsi_mq() and qla2xx_dif_start_scsi_mq() we grab the
> qpair->qp_lock but do access members of the qpair before having the lock.
> Re-order the locking sequence to have all read and write access to qpair
> members under the qpair->qp_lock.
Cavium folks, please review!
I am testing it internally, will update by tomorrow.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Thanks,
Himanshu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists