[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7686A840-575D-4760-8D83-372394F59041@cavium.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:33:16 +0000
From: "Madhani, Himanshu" <Himanshu.Madhani@...ium.com>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
CC: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Linux SCSI Mailinglist <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstream <qla2xxx-upstream@...ium.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qla2xxx: Protect access to qpair members with
qpair->qp_lock
> On Jun 23, 2017, at 12:10 AM, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de> wrote:
>
> In qla2xx_start_scsi_mq() and qla2xx_dif_start_scsi_mq() we grab the
> qpair->qp_lock but do access members of the qpair before having the lock.
> Re-order the locking sequence to have all read and write access to qpair
> members under the qpair->qp_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Changes to v1:
> * Use __qla2x00_marker() instead of qla2x00_marker which is fit to be called
> with the qp_lock held (John)
> * Don't protect qpair->online and qpair->difdix_supported as it's not
> needed (Hannes)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c
> index 8404f17f3c6c..c64036ddd365 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_iocb.c
> @@ -1770,6 +1770,9 @@ qla2xxx_start_scsi_mq(srb_t *sp)
> struct qla_hw_data *ha = vha->hw;
> struct qla_qpair *qpair = sp->qpair;
>
> + /* Acquire qpair specific lock */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&qpair->qp_lock, flags);
> +
> /* Setup qpair pointers */
> rsp = qpair->rsp;
> req = qpair->req;
> @@ -1779,15 +1782,14 @@ qla2xxx_start_scsi_mq(srb_t *sp)
>
> /* Send marker if required */
> if (vha->marker_needed != 0) {
> - if (qla2x00_marker(vha, req, rsp, 0, 0, MK_SYNC_ALL) !=
> - QLA_SUCCESS)
> + if (__qla2x00_marker(vha, req, rsp, 0, 0, MK_SYNC_ALL) !=
> + QLA_SUCCESS) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qpair->qp_lock, flags);
> return QLA_FUNCTION_FAILED;
> + }
> vha->marker_needed = 0;
> }
>
> - /* Acquire qpair specific lock */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&qpair->qp_lock, flags);
> -
> /* Check for room in outstanding command list. */
> handle = req->current_outstanding_cmd;
> for (index = 1; index < req->num_outstanding_cmds; index++) {
> @@ -1942,6 +1944,8 @@ qla2xxx_dif_start_scsi_mq(srb_t *sp)
> return qla2xxx_start_scsi_mq(sp);
> }
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&qpair->qp_lock, flags);
> +
> /* Setup qpair pointers */
> rsp = qpair->rsp;
> req = qpair->req;
> @@ -1951,15 +1955,14 @@ qla2xxx_dif_start_scsi_mq(srb_t *sp)
>
> /* Send marker if required */
> if (vha->marker_needed != 0) {
> - if (qla2x00_marker(vha, req, rsp, 0, 0, MK_SYNC_ALL) !=
> - QLA_SUCCESS)
> + if (__qla2x00_marker(vha, req, rsp, 0, 0, MK_SYNC_ALL) !=
> + QLA_SUCCESS) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qpair->qp_lock, flags);
> return QLA_FUNCTION_FAILED;
> + }
> vha->marker_needed = 0;
> }
>
> - /* Acquire ring specific lock */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&qpair->qp_lock, flags);
> -
> /* Check for room in outstanding command list. */
> handle = req->current_outstanding_cmd;
> for (index = 1; index < req->num_outstanding_cmds; index++) {
> --
> 2.12.3
>
Looks Good.
Acked-By: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...ium.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists