linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] Introduce regmap infrastructure over Maxim/Dalas OneWire (W1) bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170628193750.jh4vbl4x32rzvcng@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:37:50 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Cc:     "Alex A. Mihaylov" <minimumlaw@...bler.ru>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Introduce regmap infrastructure over Maxim/Dalas
 OneWire (W1) bus

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:26:31PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

> 26.05.2017, 20:18, "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 04:45:12PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

> > Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
> > substantially less than 80 columns. Doing this makes your messages much
> > easier to read and reply to.

> What part of the message spans behind this limit? Did you handwrap paragraph below
> or it looked like a single line?

Essentially every line of your mail is overly long, including the first
line of the above paragraph.  I've not reflowed anything.  I'd guess
your client is doing the wrapping (this is fairly standard for GUI
clients).

> >>  What is the reason to use regmap besides caching?

> > There's the other reasons I mentioned in the message you're replying
> > to for a start...

> That didn't show how it helps w1, so was the question.

I'm not clear why any of these benefits would be less applicable to w1
than to other buses.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)