[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1498777317.6130.5.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:01:57 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: Always set vtime_snap_whence after
accounting vtime
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 19:15 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Even though it doesn't have functional consequences, setting
> the task's new context state after we actually accounted the pending
> vtime from the old context state makes more sense from a review
> perspective.
>
> vtime_user_exit() is the only function that doesn't follow that rule
> and that can bug the reviewer for a little while until he realizes
> there
> is no reason for this special case.
>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists