[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1498777341.6130.6.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 19:02:21 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: Rename vtime fields
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 19:15 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The current "snapshot" based naming on vtime fields suggests we
> record
> some past event but that's a low level picture of their actual
> purpose
> which comes out blurry. The real point of these fields is to run a
> basic
> state machine that tracks down cputime entry while switching between
> contexts.
>
> So lets reflect that with more meaningful names.
>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists