[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <808a7db0-7844-b263-0216-1fe943ac819a@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:16:15 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"frowand.list@...il.com" <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"brian.starkey@....com" <brian.starkey@....com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"minyard@....org" <minyard@....org>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] ACPI: Translate the I/O range of non-MMIO devices
before scanning
On 16/06/2017 12:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > It causes acpi_default_enumeration() to be called but it should be fine
>>>> >> > as we are dealing with platform device anyway.
>>> >>
>>> >> I do not quite understand how declaring such MFD cell above would make sure
>>> >> that the LPC probe is called before the IPMI device is enumerated...
>> >
>> > In fact it may be that it is not sufficient in this case because the
>> > ACPI core might enumerate child devices before the LPC driver even gets
>> > a chance to probe so you would need to add also scan handler to the
>> > child devices and mark them already enumerated or something like that.
> Or extend the special I2C/SPI handling to them.
>
For this, is it possible to just configure the ACPI table so we spoof
that the LPC slave (IPI0001), is an i2c/spi slave? Could we just add a
resource of type ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS, and common serial bus
type i2c/spi to solve this?
This resource would/should need to be ignored for other purposes.
John
> Thanks,
> Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists