linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] staging: ccree: Use __func_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1498756125-3330-1-git-send-email-karthik@techveda.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:38:45 +0530
From:   karthik@...hveda.org
To:     gilad@...yossef.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sunil.m@...hveda.org,
        Karthik Tummala <karthik@...hveda.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: ccree: Use __func__ instead of function name

From: Karthik Tummala <karthik@...hveda.org>

Fixed following checkpatch.pl warning:
	WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using
the function's name, in a string

It is prefered to use '%s & __func__' instead of function
name for logging.

Signed-off-by: Karthik Tummala <karthik@...hveda.org>
---
Changes for v2:
v1 was a patch series, which consisted of two patches in which
second one was already submitted by Gilad Ben-Yossef, so dropped
that one.

Patch generated on staging-testing as suggested by Greg-K H.
---
 drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c
index 1fc0b05..1168161 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ccree/ssi_aead.c
@@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static int config_gcm_context(struct aead_request *req)
 				(req->cryptlen - ctx->authsize);
 	__be32 counter = cpu_to_be32(2);
 
-	SSI_LOG_DEBUG("config_gcm_context() cryptlen = %d, req->assoclen = %d ctx->authsize = %d\n", cryptlen, req->assoclen, ctx->authsize);
+	SSI_LOG_DEBUG("%s() cryptlen = %d, req->assoclen = %d ctx->authsize = %d\n", __func__, cryptlen, req->assoclen, ctx->authsize);
 
 	memset(req_ctx->hkey, 0, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
 
@@ -2198,7 +2198,7 @@ static int ssi_rfc4106_gcm_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key, unsign
 	struct ssi_aead_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	SSI_LOG_DEBUG("ssi_rfc4106_gcm_setkey()  keylen %d, key %p\n", keylen, key);
+	SSI_LOG_DEBUG("%s()  keylen %d, key %p\n", __func__, keylen, key);
 
 	if (keylen < 4)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2216,7 +2216,7 @@ static int ssi_rfc4543_gcm_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, const u8 *key, unsign
 	struct ssi_aead_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	SSI_LOG_DEBUG("ssi_rfc4543_gcm_setkey()  keylen %d, key %p\n", keylen, key);
+	SSI_LOG_DEBUG("%s()  keylen %d, key %p\n", __func__, keylen, key);
 
 	if (keylen < 4)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
1.9.1