[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878tkaqgu2.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:45:09 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Ellerman
> <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:02:39 UTC, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> local_irq_enable can cause interrupts to be taken which could
>>> take significant amount of processing time. The idle process
>>> should set its polling flag before this, so another process that
>>> wakes it during this time will not have to send an IPI.
>>>
>>> Expand the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG coverage to as large as possible.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>>
>> Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3fc5ee927ff4ffed6aa2fcd44d2fbf
>
> OK
>
> I've applied it too, so I guess I should drop it?
Erk sorry. I hadn't heard anything so I picked it up.
If you can drop it that would be good, but if not git will probably work
it out mostly :)
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists