[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i7kmgVdaqajChvyvebK8ZpjY8HTnLbAH7-ktmj4K8QZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:51:08 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [1/3] cpuidle: powerpc: cpuidle set polling before enabling irqs
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Michael Ellerman
>> <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:02:39 UTC, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>>> local_irq_enable can cause interrupts to be taken which could
>>>> take significant amount of processing time. The idle process
>>>> should set its polling flag before this, so another process that
>>>> wakes it during this time will not have to send an IPI.
>>>>
>>>> Expand the TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG coverage to as large as possible.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.
>>>
>>> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/3fc5ee927ff4ffed6aa2fcd44d2fbf
>>
>> OK
>>
>> I've applied it too, so I guess I should drop it?
>
> Erk sorry. I hadn't heard anything so I picked it up.
>
> If you can drop it that would be good, but if not git will probably work
> it out mostly :)
I've dropped it, no problem.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists