[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWEaR=hwQzfaVw6F8gtaTY_r1RCssK6YFnP7Z0ZP9ZcJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:41:44 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/entry: add unwind hint annotations
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hmm. There's another option that might be considerably nicer, though:
> put the IRQ stack at a known (at link time) position *in percpu
> space*. (Presumably it already is -- I haven't checked.) Then we do:
>
> .macro ENTER_IRQ_STACK old_rsp
> DEBUG_ENTRY_ASSERT_IRQS_OFF
> movq %rsp, \old_rsp
> incl PER_CPU_VAR(irq_count)
>
> /*
> * Right now, if we just incremented irq_count to zero, we've
> * claimed the IRQ stack but we haven't switched to it yet.
> * Anything that can interrupt us here without using IST
> * must be *extremely* careful to limit its stack usage.
> */
> jnz .Lpush_old_rsp_\@
> movq \old_rsp, PER_CPU_VAR(top_word_in_irq_stack)
> movq PER_CPU_VAR(irq_stack_ptr), %rsp
> .Lpush_old_rsp_\@:
> pushq \old_rsp
> .endm
>
How about the two commits here (well, soon to be there once gitweb catches up):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/entry_irq_stack&id=0f56a55bb133cd53ccb78ca51378086296618322
If you like them, want to add them to your series?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists