linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clocksource: em_sti: fix error return codes in em_sti

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAH6sp9MeVVFx4kz=FkMvbFE2hZhRpXQQct7X0Po0Zdg55kBtpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:44:56 +0200
From:   Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: em_sti: fix error return codes in em_sti_probe()

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
<garsilva@...eddedor.com> wrote:
> Propagate the return values of platform_get_irq and
> devm_request_irq on failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c b/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
> index bc48cbf..c4818dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int em_sti_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>         if (irq < 0) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
> -               return -EINVAL;
> +               return irq;
>         }
>
>         /* map memory, let base point to the STI instance */
> @@ -314,11 +314,12 @@ static int em_sti_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (IS_ERR(p->base))
>                 return PTR_ERR(p->base);
>
> -       if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, em_sti_interrupt,
> +       irq = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, em_sti_interrupt,
>                              IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL | IRQF_NOBALANCING,
> -                            dev_name(&pdev->dev), p)) {
> +                            dev_name(&pdev->dev), p);
> +       if (irq) {
>                 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request low IRQ\n");
> -               return -ENOENT;
> +               return irq;
>         }

This works. Yet I think that 'ret' would be a better candidate for
taking the result of devm_request_irq, since it doesn't return the irq
number on success. Should someone decide to reference irq at a later
point in the code, this has to be changed.