[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706301417080.1748@nanos>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:17:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] pinctrl: samsung: Remove bogus irq_[un]mask from
resource management
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > The irq chip callbacks irq_request/release_resources() have absolutely no
> > business with masking and unmasking the irq.
> >
> > The core code unmasks the interrupt after complete setup and masks it
> > before invoking irq_release_resources().
> >
> > The unmask is actually harmful as it happens before the interrupt is
> > completely initialized in __setup_irq().
> >
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Fixes: f6a8249f9e55 ("pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as EINTs")
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Does this patch have a dependency on the rest of the series or should
> I just apply it as-is?
Has no dependecies at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists