[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36bdf915-6741-c3a6-cfa3-75ccb3769d93@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:49:37 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] genirq: Distangle irq_request/release_resources()
from irq_desc->lock
On 29/06/17 22:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The irq_request/release_resources() callbacks are a problem on RT as they
> are called under irq_desc->lock with interrupts disabled.
>
> Aside of that calling them under irq_desc->lock is conceptually wrong and
> has a (hard to trigger and probably theoretical) issue in free_irq(). See
> patch 4/5 for a detailed explanation.
>
> The series contains also a fix for the exynos gpio driver, which fiddles
> with the irq masking in the resource callbacks, which is bogus and
> potentially harmful.
>
> Finally it moves the irq timings deallocation out of the spin locked region.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 4 --
> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 3 +
> kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 1
> kernel/irq/manage.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++------------
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists