lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaw3APxQhNw9zmc5-41s6jxSS34f7BZ-PncNpmW0=-_8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:49:05 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: rza1: make structures rza1_gpiochip_template and
 rza1_pinmux_ops static

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> structures rza1_gpiochip_template and rza1_pinmux_ops do not need to be
> in global scope, so make them static.
>
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'rza1_gpiochip_template' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'rza1_pinmux_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ