[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707021957180.2296@nanos>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 20:07:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, bhe@...hat.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/12] x86/apic: Unify interrupt mode setup for
SMP-capable system
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Dou Liyang wrote:
> -static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(void)
> +static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(int *upmode)
> {
> /* Check kernel option */
> if (disable_apic) {
> @@ -1206,12 +1208,30 @@ static int __init apic_intr_mode_select(void)
> if (!smp_found_config) {
> disable_ioapic_support();
>
> - if (!acpi_lapic)
> + if (!acpi_lapic) {
> pr_info("APIC: ACPI MADT or MP tables are not detected\n");
> + *upmode = true;
That store and extra argument is pointless.
> +
> + return APIC_VIRTUAL_WIRE_NO_CONFIG;
You added an extra return code, which you can use exactly for that purpose
at the callsite.
Aside of that, if you use int * then use numbers, if you use bool then use
true/false. But mixing that is horrible.
> + }
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists