linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: ks7010: Fix cast to restricted __le16 in ks_wlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b81ac67d-a7ac-5907-6378-d5a88d017973@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 2 Jul 2017 22:49:43 +0200
From:   Janusz Lisiecki <janusz.lisiecki@...il.com>
To:     Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Driver Project Developer List 
        <driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: ks7010: Fix cast to restricted __le16 in
 ks_wlan_net.c

W dniu 2017-07-02 o 21:38, Luc Van Oostenryck pisze:
> On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Janusz Lisiecki
> <janusz.lisiecki@...il.com> wrote:
>> This patch fixes the following Sparse warnings in ks_wlan_net.c:
>> drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c:1359:24: warning: cast to restricted __le16
>> Both sides of assignment are u16 so (as 'ap' is local_ap_t type and 'capability' member,
>> have the same as local 'capabilities' type of u16) 'le16_to_cpu' is not needed
> It could be that it's ap->capability's type that is wrong (not
> annotated with __le16).
> Isn't it?
>
> Is ap->capability supposed to hold a little-endian value or a native
> order value?
>
> -- Luc
As I see in ks_hostif.c all assignments to link_ap_info_t->capability 
threat this value as native order (i.e get_ap_information, 
get_current_ap). As this is not a structure which comes from HW we can 
do the way you suggested. Still, as all other places in code threats 
this as native order value I decided to change only one place than many 
other around to fix Sparse warning.

Pozdrawiam,
Janusz Lisiecki