[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707021432030.2296@nanos>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 14:43:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
vikas.shivappa@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] x86/intel_rdt/cqm: Add mon_data
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> Add a mon_data directory for the root rdtgroup and all other rdtgroups.
> The directory holds all of the monitored data for all domains and events
> of all resources being monitored.
Again. This does two things at once. Move the existing code to a new file
and add the monitoring stuff. Please split it apart.
> +static bool __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> +{
> + u64 tval;
> +
> + tval = __rmid_read(rmid, rr->evtid);
> + if (tval & (RMID_VAL_ERROR | RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL)) {
> + rr->val = tval;
> + return false;
> + }
> + switch (rr->evtid) {
> + case QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID:
> + rr->val += tval;
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
I have no idea what that return code means.
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void mon_event_count(void *info)
Some explanation why this is a void pointer and how that function is called
(I assume it's via IPI) would be appreciated.
> +{
> + struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, *entry;
> + struct rmid_read *rr = info;
> + struct list_head *llist;
*head;
> +
> + rdtgrp = rr->rgrp;
> +
> + if (!__mon_event_count(rdtgrp->rmid, rr))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * For Ctrl groups read data from child monitor groups.
> + */
> + llist = &rdtgrp->crdtgrp_list;
> +
> + if (rdtgrp->type == RDTCTRL_GROUP) {
> + list_for_each_entry(entry, llist, crdtgrp_list) {
> + if (!__mon_event_count(entry->rmid, rr))
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +static int get_rdt_resourceid(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + if (r > (rdt_resources_all + RDT_NUM_RESOURCES - 1) ||
> + r < rdt_resources_all ||
> + ((r - rdt_resources_all) % sizeof(struct rdt_resource)))
> + return -EINVAL;
If that ever happens, then you have other problems than a wrong pointer.
> +
> + return ((r - rdt_resources_all) / sizeof(struct rdt_resource));
Moo. Can't you simply put an index field into struct rdt_resource,
intialize it with the resource ID and use that?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists