[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170704104359.GB29883@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:43:59 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rmem: support for dma_addr different from phys_addr
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:34:38PM +0300, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote:
> On some systems, dma address differs from physical one due to
> various reasons.
>
> dma_init_coherent_memory is aware of it, it takes both
> phys_addr_t and dma_addt_t arguments for memory block.
> However, rmem_dma_device_init passes physical address for DMA one.
>
> Fix this, using phys_to_dma(). This assumes the whole buffer has
> same offset between physical and dma addresses.
>
> Change-Id: Ic709312941ee4e1a37afb2ea25cbd759eabc009b
What is that line for? You didn't use checkpatch.pl :(
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Ok, this is getting really annoying, according to my lawyers, I have to
never respond to emails with this in it, and should just delete it. But
I'll be nice, and tell you all to go fix all of Intel's email system to
never send this stuff out again, it keeps happening over and over and
over and is preventing you from contributing to open source projects.
email is now deleted.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists