linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] regmap: irq: allow different device for irq chip and regmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170704104449.33esknbnloog2c3m@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jul 2017 11:44:49 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Grzeschik <mgr@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regmap: irq: allow different device for irq chip and
 regmap

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > syscon is one potential thing here but it seems odd for the sort of
> > hardware that syscon handles to be a good fit for regmap-irq.

> We have the special case that we use the syscon as the basic driver
> underneath some subdevices that vary in function. We have six arcnet
> controllers sitting side by side in an 8 byte offset. And after them we
> have the next small memory windows for an reset controller and one
> interrupt controller which the other devices reference.

Why is this a syscon and not a MFD?  It sounds exactly like a MFD to me,
syscon is more for cases where things are really jumbled together (even
in single registers) but that sounds like a bunch of separate register
ranges for separate devices that happen to be very close together in
address.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)