[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcfDdSCoU=DZyF1BD0YX9KfmLnptnHU9fgBQY3g-NW7PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:51:36 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Broadcom Kernel Feedback List
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>,
Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop unnecessary includes from include/linux/gpio/driver.h
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> 2017-07-04 21:58 GMT+09:00 William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>:
> So, I need to think about how to merge this (if the basic idea of this is OK).
>
> Maybe,
>
> [1] Send patches to subsystems (gpio, pinctrl, etc.) for v4.14
> [2] Drop unneeded includes from linux/gpio/driver.h for v4.15
Perhaps, fixing users (drivers!) first. then frameworks / libraries,
at last header itself (in each case perhaps follow the split I
proposed earlier).
My wish is to get gpiolib-acpi patch completely separate from the bunch.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists