linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: sun4i: switch to atomic PWM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170706070016.asujxs3ibkqq6jzj@piout.net>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:00:16 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@...imaker.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: sun4i: switch to atomic PWM

On 06/07/2017 at 08:49:22 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Switch to atomic PWM. The main goal is to properly wait for a period before
> > disabling a channel to ensure the correct level is set on the output.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> >  - fixed remaining checkpatch warnings
> >  - split the series to ease reviews
> >  - changed the delay handling to ensure the proper amount of time has elapsed
> >    before disabling a channel
> >  - dropped RDY bit handling as it doesn't have any real effect.
> > 
> > Alexandre Belloni (3):
> >   pwm: sun4i: improve hardware read out
> >   pwm: sun4i: switch to atomic PWM
> >   pwm: sun4i: drop legacy callbacks
> > 
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 263 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >  1 file changed, 148 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> 
> Series applied, though you could've just squashed together patches 2 and
> 3 because they don't make sense apart.
> 

Ok, thanks. IIRC, Boris suggested the split ;)

> Thierry



-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com