[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170706090210.3bbfd3e6@bbrezillon>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:02:10 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@...imaker.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] pwm: sun4i: switch to atomic PWM
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:00:16 +0200
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 at 08:49:22 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > Switch to atomic PWM. The main goal is to properly wait for a period before
> > > disabling a channel to ensure the correct level is set on the output.
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - fixed remaining checkpatch warnings
> > > - split the series to ease reviews
> > > - changed the delay handling to ensure the proper amount of time has elapsed
> > > before disabling a channel
> > > - dropped RDY bit handling as it doesn't have any real effect.
> > >
> > > Alexandre Belloni (3):
> > > pwm: sun4i: improve hardware read out
> > > pwm: sun4i: switch to atomic PWM
> > > pwm: sun4i: drop legacy callbacks
> > >
> > > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 263 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 148 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> >
> > Series applied, though you could've just squashed together patches 2 and
> > 3 because they don't make sense apart.
> >
>
> Ok, thanks. IIRC, Boris suggested the split ;)
Yes, I did it because the diff was really hard to review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists