linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: stmmac: revert "support future possible different internal phy mode"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170706.104514.1212305295126379350.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 06 Jul 2017 10:45:14 +0100 (WEST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     clabbe.montjoie@...il.com
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: stmmac: revert "support future possible
 different internal phy mode"

From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:51:47 +0200

> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>> Since internal phy-mode is reserved for non-xMII protocol we cannot use
>> it with dwmac-sun8i
>> This reverts commit 1c2fa5f84683 ("net: stmmac: support future possible different internal phy mode")
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
>> ---
> 
> Hello
> 
> This patch was left not applied but all other patch from this serie was.
> Could you apply it, or perhaps you prefer I resend it with some "Fixes:"

You never need to ask questions like this.

If it's not active in my patchwork queue, you must resend.

Thank you.