linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: stmmac: revert "support future possible different internal phy mode"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v64SY5L9gJP3ZBViskWoUJ8V_9FTdtevGPiBW2EzgSyOAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2017 18:37:59 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: stmmac: revert "support future
 possible different internal phy mode"

Hi Corentin,

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:45 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:51:47 +0200
>
>> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:31:59PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> Since internal phy-mode is reserved for non-xMII protocol we cannot use
>>> it with dwmac-sun8i
>>> This reverts commit 1c2fa5f84683 ("net: stmmac: support future possible different internal phy mode")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> This patch was left not applied but all other patch from this serie was.
>> Could you apply it, or perhaps you prefer I resend it with some "Fixes:"
>
> You never need to ask questions like this.
>
> If it's not active in my patchwork queue, you must resend.
>
> Thank you.

Your series was not applied at all. See the status on patchwork:

    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/783179/

Maxime's patch to revert all device tree changes in net-next was
applied first.

Please rebase and resend this patch for netdev (not net-next).

ChenYu