lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1707060958010.24679@east.gentwo.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2017 10:02:33 -0500 (CDT)
From:   Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: make allocation counters per-order

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Roman Gushchin wrote:

> +#define PGALLOC_EVENTS_SIZE (MAX_NR_ZONES * MAX_ORDER)
> +#define PGALLOC_EVENTS_CUT_SIZE (MAX_NR_ZONES * (MAX_ORDER - 1))
> +#define PGALLOC_FIRST_ZONE (PGALLOC_NORMAL - ZONE_NORMAL)


You are significantly increasing the per cpu counters (ZONES *
MAX_ORDER * cpus!!!). This will increase the cache footprint of critical
functions significantly and thus lead to regressions.

Typically counters for zones are placed in the zone structures but
you would also significantly increase the per zone counters ...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ