[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72337BAD-680C-46BC-8DF5-645028E08F65@aosc.io>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 07:13:30 +0800
From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: sunxi: add support of R40 to A10 pinctrl driver
于 2017年7月7日 GMT+08:00 上午4:50:30, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> 写到:
>On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:28:22PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(B, 0),
>> SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"),
>> SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"),
>> - SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c0")), /* SCK */
>> + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c0"), /* SCK */
>> + SUNXI_FUNCTION_VARIANT(0x3,
>> + "pll_lock_dbg",
>> + PINCTRL_SUN8I_R40)),
>
>You have a number of lines where the wrapping is not consistent with
>the rest, such as this one, but also...
I think this one is because of extraordinary function name.
>
>> SUNXI_PIN(SUNXI_PINCTRL_PIN(B, 20),
>> SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio_in"),
>> SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x1, "gpio_out"),
>> - SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c2")), /* SCK */
>> + SUNXI_FUNCTION(0x2, "i2c2"), /* SCK */
>> + SUNXI_FUNCTION_VARIANT(0x4,
>> + "pwm", /* PWM4 */
>> + PINCTRL_SUN8I_R40)),
>
>... this one for example. Please fix this.
>
>Looks good otherwise.
>
>Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists