linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/KASLR: exclude EFI_BOOT_SERVICES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:07:59 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:     Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com" <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        "fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com" <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/KASLR: exclude EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_{CODE|DATA}
 from KASLR's choice

On 07/06/17 at 03:57pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul, at 08:31:07AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nr_desc; i++) {
> > +		md = (efi_memory_desc_t *)(pmap + (i * e->efi_memdesc_size));
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_{CODE|DATA} are avoided because boot
> > +		 * services regions could be accessed after ExitBootServices()
> > +		 * due to the workaround for buggy firmware.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!(md->type == EFI_LOADER_CODE ||
> > +		      md->type == EFI_LOADER_DATA ||
> > +		      md->type == EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY))
> > +			continue;
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to *only* use EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY?
> 
> You can't re-use EFI_LOADER_* regions because the kaslr code is run so
> early in boot that you've no idea if data the kernel will need is in
> those EFI_LOADER_* regions.
> 
> For example, we pass struct setup_data objects inside of
> EFI_LOADER_DATA regions.

It doesn't matter because we have tried to avoid those memory setup_data
resides in in mem_avoid_overlap(). Here discarding EFI_LOADER_* could
discard the whole regions while setup_data could occupy small part of
them.